Postgraduate Seminar Series - Speakers 4th August 2016
1pm - Zoology Museum (Wallace 129)
S P E A K E R 1
Seaweed aquaculture - challenges and perspectives
Jessica Knoop
When it
comes to seaweeds many people associate them with slimy rotting masses along
beaches and are not aware of their ecologic importance and economic potential.
They are used since ancient times for a variety of applications, as a food
source in Asian countries and mainly for non-food applications in the West. Recently,
seaweed popularity increased in western countries – it was rebranded as a
superfood and used as a biofilter in Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA)
systems. Especially red algae of the genus Porphyra
have gained fundamental attention because of their economic value, high
content in health-beneficial substances and the growing interest of the public
and the industry to use natural and local products. Because the European
industry is relying on seaweed harvesting instead of farming, Porphyra populations are facing
increasing pressure in South Wales. Successful cultivation would conserve
natural stocks and improve product yield and quality through optimising
culturing conditions and strain selection. However, seaweed aquaculture is at
its infancy and nearly non-existent in Europe with many challenges to be solved
for a successful and reliable cultivation.
S P E A K E R 2
Natural enemy composition rather than richness determines pest density and plant biomass
Sanaa N. Abed
Natural enemy (NE) biodiversity is
thought to play an important role in agricultural pest suppression. However,
the relative importance of the number of NE species (diversity per se), versus the particular
combinations of species (species composition), in determining aphid suppression
and ultimately crop yields remains poorly understood. We tested the effects of
NE diversity and composition on pea aphids Acyrthosiphon
pisum and broad bean plants Vicia
faba. The NEs we used were the larvae of two predator species, the ladybird
Adalia bipunctata and the green lacewing Chrysopa carnea, and the
parasitic wasp Aphidius ervi. We found NEs generally reduced aphid density and indirectly increased
the biomass of plants. Among NE treatments, the richness of species did not
affect aphid density or plant biomass, but the composition of NEs within
richness levels affected both responses. The best-performing treatments in
control of aphids were the single species treatment of ladybird, the ladybird
and parasitoid treatment, and the three species treatment. Planned contrasts
showed that the ladybird was the key species among the treatments. Plant biomass was increased in
treatments that treated by NEs comparing to the once did not treat with NEs,
which indicated decreasing aphid density will increase plant biomass. In
conclusion, increasing NE diversity did not consistently affect aphid density
or plant biomass. Rather, having a key species (the ladybird) among the divers
NEs species was more important than species number per se in the biological control of aphids and their impacts on
plant biomass.
No comments:
Post a Comment